|
SENATE MINUTES |
|
Meeting Date: |
9 December 2004 |
Status of Minutes: |
APPROVED |
|
Senate Session: |
XXI |
Meeting Number: |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SESSION XXI, MEETING #9 December 9, 2004 |
||||||
| Present: |
Present: C. Burns, J. Murphy, K.S.Young, B.
Holtman, F. Blanco, P. Savoye, J. Benjamin, F. Craig, L. Rashidi, S.
Holderby, J. Halstead, M. Lane, B. Manavizadeh, R. Stender, A. Gaskievicz,
L. Cass, M. Jones, T. Elsasser, J. Kagle, M. Gaballa, B. Ganong, J.
Tan, A. Longoria, W. Thornsley, N. Werner-Burke, T. Murphy, W. Keeth,
K.Thorne, M. Materese, J. Bosworth, A. Johnson, D. Dietz, D. Crowder,
I. Newman, S. Brown, J. Mansfield, A. Chavira-Prado, M. Moore. |
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
| I. |
C. Burns called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. Minutes of Nov. 18, 2004 were approved by unanimous consent. |
APPROVED |
||||
| II. |
Treasurer's Report (B. Holtman) The current account balance is $1185. |
To Contents |
||||
|
|
||||||
| III. |
|
|||||
| IV. |
Committee Reports |
|||||
| A. |
Approved a lot in foreign language—will require an English grammar course. Also many changes in English. |
To Contents | ||||
|
|
B. |
Academic
Affairs (F. Blanco) AAC moves to approve the change of the name of PSY 1151 Application
of Psychology to Psychology First-Year Seminar and add
co-requisites: PSY 1101 Motion # 2 AAC moves to approve the change of course numbers for the following courses: PSY 1191 Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology to 2206, and PSY 2204 Survey Research Methods to 3304, PSY 2250 Experimental Design I to 3306 Purpose and nature of change: Realignment of course numbering to support
the appropriate level and sequence for psychology majors. Motion # 3 AAC moves to approve the new course Soc 3280 Sociology of Deviant Behavior Purpose and Nature of Course: Motion # 4 AAC moves to approve the change of the final grade for the
course BI 1100 Orientation to Biology from Pass/Fail with attendance
required to a letter grade with attendance required. Motion # 5 AAC moves to approve the course change request for BSC 1122 Human Anatomy & Physiology I and BI 1122 Human Anatomy & Physiology II To restrict enrollment to majors in Nursing, Nutrition & Dietetics,
Music Therapy, Respiratory Therapy and Radiology Technology or permission
of instructor. Motion # 6 AAC moves to approve the new standards for Bachelor’s of Science in Nursing (BSN)
No discussion, motion carried. Motion # 7 AAC moves to approve Program Change in General Education Program to permit substitution for UNV 1100 seminar. Courses must be submitted to the First Year Seminar Committee for approval prior to AAC consideration. Discussion: F. Blanco explained some dept. orientation classes overlap the material in UNV 1100. They must keep the same concepts as UNV 1100 if they substitute their class. A. Longoria asked if the UNV 1100 committee is appointed or elected. F. Blanco said the first committee was appointed by the provost, but will become a sub-committee of AAC as of Jan. 1, 2005. L. Rashidi said if people take orientation in one dept. and change majors, they will take UNV again. Also, important to take UNV in the 1st semester. Is there a guarantee that orientation courses will be available to all incoming students? A. Johnson said the library is concerned that the information awareness segment is still in the class so all students get that (the library tour). T. Murphy asked how the guidelines are made available (D. Seigart supplies them). W. Keeth asked about changes of majors. K. Young clarified that the subcommittee move to AAC would have to take place through constitutional changes. Some discussion on if orientation classes sub for UNV, then shouldn’t UNV sub for the orientation classes. A number of people said absolutely not. J. Murphy asked if this move was to save money. M. Lane said no. K. Young asked if this problem of overlap had been assessed properly—sounds more like a solution before we know what the problem is. Also, this move seems to go against the philosophy of the UNV course. J. Halstead said he hoped the UNV committee would scrutinize the proposals. Motion carried. Motion # 8 AAC moves to approve the elimination of UNV 1100 from Biology degree programs in favor of BI 1100 Orientation to Biology Discussion: L. Rashidi clarified this has already gone through the UNV committee. W. Keeth asked what the similarities are between UNV and Biology orientation. How are they fitting it all in? D. Solan said they cover 90-95% of what is covered. They are trying to implement reading the common book. They do 5-6 class periods on how to study. J. Bosworth said the committee reviewed the syllabus, long discussions with biology rep. W. Keeth said this is so focused to 1 discipline that we may disadvantage students when they are taking courses in other disciplines. L. Cass—they tend to put students with their own faculty when assigning UNV classes. Motion carried. Motion # 9 AAC moves to approve the Program Change for Biology CMT Motion # 10 AAC moves to approve the Program Change for Medical Technology
(BS.MT)
No discussion, motion carried. Motion # 11 AAC moves to approve the Program Change for Biology/Fisheries
No discussion, motion carried. C. Burns asked if there was any objection to correcting the name in motion #9. No objections. Motion # 12 AAC moves to approve the Program Change for Biology, Environmental
Science Concentration
Discussion: C. Burns asked if there was any objection to eliminating line 2 in motions 12 and 13. No objection. Motion carried. Motion # 13 AAC moves to approve the Program Change for Biology, B.S.BI
Program
No discussion, motion carried. Motion # 14 AAC moves to approve the Program Change for Social Work
Discussion: W. Keeth argued about the wording. T. Murphy moved to amend by switching places of UNV1100 and SEK 2247. Amendment carried. Motion carried. Motion # 15 AAC moves to approve the proposed Honor Code to be included in the catalog. Preamble Academic integrity is essential for a positive learning environment. The Center for Academic Integrity[, of which Mansfield University is a member,] defines academic integrity as a commitment to the following five fundamental values:
As part of Mansfield University's pledge to foster intellectual and
personal growth, we, the members of the Mansfield University community,
uphold the highest standards of honesty and academic integrity. Members
of the University community are expected to observe complete honesty
in all academic matters. Students, faculty, and staff are responsible
for creating an environment of academic integrity, academic freedom,
and mutual respect. The responsibility for upholding these principles
lies with the individual as well as the entire community. Expectations As members of a community of learning, students as well as faculty
are expected to be active participants in classes and contribute productively
to the university’s academic mission.
All Faculty are expected to:
Faculty members are expected to explain in class and/or on syllabi their policies regarding acceptable types of assistance for assigned activities and examinations. Faculty members are expected to treat students and their colleagues with respect, to be familiar with the Honor Code, to promote adherence to its provisions, and to explain in class and/or on syllabi their policies regarding acceptable types of assistance for assigned activities and examinations. Faculty members who have evidence of honor code violations are expected to follow university procedures and file the appropriate forms with the Office of the Provost. The Office of the Provost is expected to issue an annual report summarizing violations of the Honor Code, and to remind students and faculty about the Honor Code expectations at the beginning of each school year. Violations of the Honor Code Violations of Mansfield University’s Honor code include but are not limited to:
Sanctions for Violations of the Honor Code When it has been determined that a violation of Mansfield University’s academic integrity policy has occurred and the circumstance is the first instance documented with the Provost’s office that a student has been charged, the faculty member who has brought the charge may impose a consequence ranging from a penalty for the assignment to failure of the course. Additionally, the faculty member or student may request that the Judicial Hearing Board conduct a formal review of the matter. In an instance where a student has been charged with an academic integrity violation for a second time, a review of the case by the Judicial Hearing Board is mandatory. At that time the Hearing Board may or may not recommend dismissal from the university. If a third instance of an academic integrity occurs the student shall be dismissed from the university. * The Center for Academic Integrity (1999), The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity. A more detailed list of Honor Code violations will be available in the Honor Code Supplement. Discussion: S. Brown—last paragraph of preamble, “student must acknowledge and accept…” how will that happen? L. Wright said it will happen if students enroll at MU or take UNV 1100. J. Halstead said any student who enters MU must adhere. Suggest we don’t have a lot of signature things. T. Murphy—not following expectations in not congruent with violations. Understands conduct out to be. Thinks violations ought to be serious (not just not preparing for class). T. Elsasser—nothing about faculty in the violations. What happens when faculty are disrespectful to students. K. Thorne—problems with language in expectations—not complementary between students and faculty. Do we have to tell students on every exam they can’t collaborate? T. Elsasser—needs to be more info about consequences. D. Dietz—speaks in favor. L. Wright—balance of philosophical and practical. This info is not in The Password. Some more talk about sanctions especially for faculty. L. Cass asked about the report and how info would be disseminated to students. M. Lane said the report would be summary and info would be emphasized at convocation, orientation, in classes, etc. A. Longoria said we need to distinguish between academic integrity and academic preparedness. J. Halstead thanked committee, said he would run it by legal council, concept can be a powerful one. Talk about consequences being specified might create contractual issues. S. Holderby asked about students monitoring one another. The phrase “uphold honor code” was as close as they could come to that. T. Murphy asked to get rid of expectations section. L. Wright said they included it for clarity. W. Keeth asked about “completing all assignments”—if someone doesn’t could that be interfering with the learning process? M. Lane asked if this could be broken up. K. Thorne asked if excessive sarcasm might count as violating “treating students with respect.” M. Materese—some of the things are so small it might water down the code. Worried about when faculty would be violating if they made an allowance for a student. N. Werner-Burke—seems like the spirit of the document is clear. S. Brown moved to amend by switching the expectations and preamble section. Discussion about order, flow of ideas. A. Longoria gave example of a student who stopped coming to class, but instructor helped them out—this switch would keep that from being a violation of the code. L. Wright said committee would prefer it as is. Amendment carried. F. Craig—what is the effect of violating expectations. Expectations are now out of the honor code, so that should be in the syllabus. W. Keeth (D. Dietz) moved to amend by deleting the line “A more detailed list of Honor Code violations will be available in the Honor Code Supplement.” M. Lane said this goes with sentence 1 in the violations. Amendment carried. K. Thorne moved to send this back to committee. J. Bosworth said he’d rather have it done right. J. Halstead said the committee could then run it by legal council. M. Lane said they could put a reference to the honor code in the catalog that would refer students to a web site. Motion to refer to committee carried. Motion # 16 AAC moves to approve the following description of Attendance Policy for the catalogue: Regular and punctual class attendance is expected. Documented excuses because of illness, serious mitigating circumstances, or official university representation will be accepted by all faculty members, thus permitting students to make up missed tests and/or graded assignments in a reasonable manner at a time convenient for the instructor. It is mandatory for the student to provide documentation before absences can be excused. Whenever possible, students must notify faculty members of absences in advance. In the case of scheduled absences, students should if at all possible arrange for make-up work to be done before the absence; in the case of an unscheduled absence, students are responsible for contacting the faculty member by the next class meeting to arrange for make-up work. Faculty members may request that the Provost’s Office withdraw a student from a course during the withdrawal period after the student has accumulated a significant number of absences. In courses where classroom participation is an integral component, student attendance is essential and may influence your final grade whether your absences are excused or unexcused. If this is the case in your course, the instructor will explain the relationship between absences and your participation grade in the syllabus during the first week of the course. Discussion: S. Brown moved to amend by changing the voice in the fourth paragraph (ie. Your to a student). Question about withdrawing—allowing them to withdraw after the end of the withdraw period gives the student an advantage. Students performing poorly after that time should be failed. S. Brown voiced dissatisfaction with the phrase, “by the next class.” A. Chavira-Prado asked about the “drop 2 quizzes” issue. M. Lane clarified that if a student has an “excused” absence, they cannot be expected to drop a missed quiz as one of their two. Faculty must treat the excused absence as no absence. Students must be allowed to make up work. Motion to call the question. Motion to call the question carried. Motion #16 lost. Motion # 17 AAC moves to approve the Programs Change for English BA and English BSE List all changes:
No discussion, motion carried. Motion # 18 AAC moves to approve the course change for FR 2205 Phonetics Pronunciation Purpose and nature of change: To Bring course into compliance with
NCATE standards; to raise number of credits from 1 to 3; to change course
title to Phonetics and Pronunciation; to revise course description and
prerequisites. Discussion: L. Cass asked what course is equivalent to FR 1102. F. Blanco said the instructor assesses whether the student has the background. Motion carried. Motion # 19 AAC moves to approve the new course FR 3310 Introduction to French Literature Purpose and Nature of Course: Introduce students to literature and give them tools to work with a range of literary texts, genres, periods, and authors Discussion: Are there prerequisites. Answer yes. Motion carried. Motion # 20 AAC moves to approve the program change for French Education (BSE) List all changes:
No discussion, motion carried. Motion # 21 AAC moves to approve the program change for French BA List all changes:
No discussion, motion carried. Motion # 22 AAC moves to approve the course description change for GER 1101 Introductory German I to make it more accurate. No discussion, motion carried. Motion # 23 AAC moves to approve the course description and prerequisites for GER 1102, GER 2201, GER 2202 No discussion, motion carried. Motion # 24 AAC moves to approve the course change for GER 2205 Phonetics and Pronunciation Purpose and nature of change: To Bring course into compliance with
NCATE standards; to raise number of credits from 1 to 3 and to revise
course description and prerequisites. No discussion, motion carried. Motion # 25 AAC moves to approve the Course Change for GER 3321 Composition and Stylistics Purpose and nature of change: To make prerequisites more accurate. No discussion, motion carried. The assembly agreed to consider motions 26-31 together Motion # 26 AAC moves to approve the Course Change for GER 3330 Survey of German Literature I Purpose and nature of change: To change course title; to make description and prerequisites more in line with new emphasis of course. New Course Title: Introduction to German Literature Prerequisites: GER 2202 or equivalent. One previous GER 3000-level course recommended. Motion # 27 AAC moves to approve the Course Change: for GER 3331 Survey of German Literature II Purpose and nature of change: To change course title; to make course description and prerequisites more accurate. New Course Title: Early German Literature Prerequisites: GER 2202 or equivalent. GER 3330 recommended. Motion # 28 AAC moves to approve the Course Change for GER 3335 Deutschlandkunde Purpose and nature of change: To change course title and add prerequisites. New Course Title: Deutsche Landeskunde Prerequisites: GER 2202 or equivalent. Motion # 29 Purpose and nature of change: To make course description and prerequisites
more accurate. Motion # 30 AAC moves to approve the Program Change for German BSE List all changes:
Motion # 31 AAC moves to approve the Program Change for German BA List all changes:
No discussion, motions 26-31 carried. Motion # 32 AAC moves to approve the deletion of the following courses: SPA 3305 Spanish Conversation and Composition, SPA 3330 Survey of Spanish Literature I, SPA 3331 Survey of Spanish Literature II, SPA 3340 Spanish-American Literature I, and SPA 3341 Spanish-American Literature II. These courses are going to be replaced by new courses. No discussion, motion carried. The assembly agreed to consider motions 33-41 together Motion # 33 AAC moves to approve the Course Change: SPA 2205 Pronunciation and Phonetics Purpose and nature of change: To Bring course into compliance with
NCATE standards; to raise number of credits from 1 to 3; to change course
title to Phonetics and Pronunciation; to revise course description and
prerequisites. Motion # 34 AAC moves to approve the New Course SPA 2225 Spanish Grammar Review Purpose and Nature of Course: Provide students with a transitional grammar course that will review basic and intermediate level grammar and prepare for upper level Spanish courses. Motion # 35 Purpose and Nature of Course: Motion # 36 AAC moves to approve the New Course SPA 3310 Introduction to Literary Studies Purpose and Nature of Course: Motion # 37 AAC moves to approve the New Course: SPA 3350 Topics in the Literature of Spain As a Topics course it will vary each semester in thematic focus. Nevertheless, one can expect to study in detail a particular era, writer, genre, or Peninsular literary phenomena. Some examples might include: The Medieval Text, Golden Age Theater, Cervantes, Bécquer, The Realist versus Surrealist Text, The Works of García Lorca, Literature of Exile, Feminist Voices in Spanish Literature, New Theater, or Avant-garde Movements. Motion # 38 AAC moves to approve the New Course SPA 3360 Topics in the Literature of Latin America As a Topics course it will vary each semester in thematic focus. Nevertheless, one can expect to study in detail a particular era, writer, genre, or Latin American literary phenomena. Some examples might include: Latin American Parody, Journalism and Art Criticism in Latin America, the Avant-garde, Latin American Children’s Literature, Feminist Voices in Latin American Literature, or Experimental Urban Theater. Motion # 39 AAC moves to approve the Program Change: Spanish Education (BSE) List all changes:
Motion # 40 AAC moves to approve the Program Change for Spanish B.A. List all changes:
Motion # 41 AAC moves to approve the Program Change for Spanish Minor List all changes:
No discussion, motions 33-41 carried.
|
||||
| C. |
Administrative Affairs & Elections (J. Benjamin) Parking—conclusion is that there is enough space, but many places aren’t being used. Looking at a fee scale for students to pay for better spaces as well as some other issues. On Wilson street there are 6 spaces reserved. Ticketing students. Students say the signs are too small. They are getting more signs. Smoking—encourage faculty to ask smokers to move away from building. Try to encourage students not to smoke around doorways. K. Thorne says she’s been doing this daily for a month—it doesn’t work. Benches and ashtrays are right by the doors. Lots of anecdotal evidence about this. Please email concerns to J. Benjamin. They are still checking with M. Reid about recycling.
|
|
||||
| D. |
Student Affairs & Admissions (S. Holderby) Had to leave. Will report next time. |
|
||||
| E. |
Information Technology (F. Craig) M.-D. Schmid will take over next month as chair.
|
|
||||
| F. |
No report.
|
|
||||
| G. |
Will be moving procedures for attendance back to faculty. He will email
suggested language for syllabi. K.Young said thank you—will help
us to connect better with our students. |
|||||
| V. |
|
|
||||
| VI. |
|
|
||||
| VII. |
Remarks for the Good of the Order None.
|
|
||||
| VIII. |
Meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. Unanimous. |
|
||||
|
Respectfully submitted,
|
||||||
Back to Mansfield University Senate Home
Page
Back to Mansfield University Home
Page